Book Review
- lisettblogs
- Jul 31, 2024
- 2 min read
Updated: Jan 7
Published March 28, 2024 by Sourcebooks Landmark
This was my first read by Stuart Turton, and I had such high hopes for it. Only 125 people remain on Earth, living on a post-apocalyptic island surrounded by an insect-infested fog. The narrator is an AI advisor communicating through the thoughts of the villagers and scientists, created to keep them alive and safe. When a murder is committed, we are thrown into a murder investigation with only 92 hours to solve the crime or all of civilization will die. Why? Because... well... reasons? I still don't have a clue.
The setting is fascinating. A dwindling human population isolated on an island surrounded by a deadly fog, an AI designed to protect and guide the remaining humans, who is also a narrator of the story. The blend of science fiction and mystery immediately caught my attention. The stakes couldn't be higher with the survival of the last humans hanging in the balance.
The first half of the story had me completely invested. I loved the originality, and I thought I knew where the book was heading. The buildup was intense, and the premise held so much promise. However, once the murder investigation really took off, I found myself losing interest. The plot began to meander, and the urgency that initially hooked me started to dissipate.
The murder investigation left me with more questions than answers. The 92-hour deadline to solve the crime added tension, but the reasons behind this ticking clock were unclear and, ultimately, unsatisfying. I struggled to stay engaged. By the end, I was left feeling confused and frustrated, with too many questions unanswered.
This is a book that I feel I would get a lot more out of on a second read-through, but I just don't have the desire to go through it a second time. I love Turton's out-of-the-box writing style, and I'm excited to give his book The 7½ Deaths of Evelyn Hardcastle a read. I'm so sad this one didn't work for me. While it has an intriguing premise and a unique narrative approach, the execution left much to be desired.
Rating: ★★





Comments